Protecting your Large Language Models and AI applications against prompt injection, data poisoning, and unauthorized access.
Integrating Generative AI into enterprise applications introduces an entirely new attack surface. Traditional firewalls and endpoint protection are blind to attacks hidden inside natural language prompts. A robust AI Security Framework is mandatory before exposing any LLM-powered application to employees or customers.
We base our security architecture on the OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Models. Key threats include:
The most prevalent threat. Attackers craft inputs that trick the LLM into ignoring its original instructions and executing the attacker's commands instead. (Mitigation: Strict input validation, parameterized prompts, and dedicated "guardrail" models.)
When an application blindly trusts the output of an LLM and executes it. For example, passing LLM output directly into a SQL query or a system shell. (Mitigation: Treat all LLM output as untrusted user input; apply output encoding and strict sandboxing.)
When an LLM accidentally reveals proprietary algorithms, PII, or credentials that were included in its training data or system prompt. (Mitigation: RAG with strict document-level RBAC; PII masking pipelines.)
Attackers sending resource-heavy queries designed to consume the LLM's context window or compute limits, driving up API costs or crashing the service. (Mitigation: API rate limiting, token limits, and query complexity analysis.)
Securing an AI agent requires layers of defense:
Our cybersecurity and AI engineering teams work together to ensure your agentic applications are bulletproof.