Facing a VMware renewal shock after the Broadcom acquisition? We run a vendor-neutral assessment of Nutanix, Hyper-V, Proxmox and KVM, then handle the migration — with zero-downtime cutover and a validated rollback plan at every stage.
In November 2023, Broadcom completed its acquisition of VMware and quickly restructured how the product is sold: perpetual licenses were discontinued, the a-la-carte product catalogue was collapsed into a small number of subscription bundles, and per-core pricing changed significantly. For many customers — particularly smaller environments and anyone who previously licensed only the specific modules they needed — renewal quotes have landed far higher than expected.
That has triggered the largest wave of hypervisor re-evaluation the industry has seen in over a decade. Some organisations are staying on VMware but optimising their footprint; others are moving core workloads to Nutanix AHV, Microsoft Hyper-V, Proxmox VE or open-source KVM. Either path requires a clear-eyed, vendor-neutral comparison — not a sales pitch from whoever benefits from the switch.
A high-level starting point — your actual best fit depends on workloads, existing skills, and budget. We provide a detailed comparison specific to your environment during the free assessment.
| Platform | Licensing Model | Best Fit | Migration Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| VMware vSphere (Broadcom) | Subscription bundles, per-core | Large enterprises needing the full VCF stack | — (staying put) |
| Nutanix AHV | Per-node / per-core subscription | Closest like-for-like HCI replacement | Low-Medium |
| Microsoft Hyper-V | Included with Windows Server / Azure Stack HCI | Microsoft-centric environments | Medium |
| Proxmox VE | Free (optional paid support subscription) | Cost-sensitive teams comfortable with open source | Medium |
| KVM (open source) | Free, self-managed | Teams with strong in-house Linux expertise | Medium-High |
Migration effort reflects typical V2V tooling maturity and operational similarity to VMware, not overall platform quality.
Full inventory of VMs, dependencies, storage and networking. Real licensing cost comparison across candidate platforms for your exact environment.
Migrate a small set of non-critical VMs first to validate tooling, performance and operational runbooks before touching production.
Production workloads move in planned batches with validated V2V conversion, minimal downtime, and a tested rollback plan at every wave.
Post-migration monitoring, capacity planning and lifecycle management so the new platform performs at least as well as what it replaced.
Since Broadcom acquired VMware in late 2023, it discontinued perpetual licenses, moved everything to subscription bundles, and raised effective prices sharply for many customers — in some cases 4-8x their previous spend. Smaller and mid-market VMware customers, and anyone using only a subset of the old a-la-carte products, have been hit hardest. This has driven a wave of organisations to evaluate Nutanix, Microsoft Hyper-V, Proxmox and open-source KVM as replacements.
There is no single "best" alternative — it depends on your workloads, budget and existing skills. Nutanix AHV is the closest like-for-like replacement with strong HCI and enterprise support. Microsoft Hyper-V is a strong fit if you are already deep in the Microsoft ecosystem. Proxmox VE offers a capable, licence-fee-free option for cost-sensitive environments. We run a vendor-neutral assessment against your actual environment before recommending one.
Savings vary by environment, but organisations moving from VMware to Nutanix AHV, Hyper-V or Proxmox commonly report 30-60% lower total licensing and support costs over a 3-year horizon, even after accounting for migration costs. We provide a concrete cost comparison for your specific core/socket count and support tier before you commit to a migration.
It carries real risk if done without proper planning, which is why we run a structured migration: full workload and dependency assessment, a pilot migration on non-critical VMs, validated V2V conversion tooling, and a rollback plan at every stage. Production cut-overs happen only after validation, so risk is managed, not eliminated by hope.
Yes, for some organisations the right move is optimising your existing VMware footprint rather than migrating — right-sizing your Broadcom bundle tier, consolidating hosts, or renegotiating your agreement. We run a vendor-neutral assessment first and will tell you honestly if staying is cheaper than moving.
A typical mid-sized environment (50-200 VMs) takes 6-12 weeks from assessment to final cut-over, run in waves so production workloads are never all at risk at once. Larger, more complex estates take longer; we provide a detailed timeline after the initial assessment.
Yes. Most migrations run VMware and the new platform side-by-side for a transition period, with workloads moved in planned waves rather than a single cutover. We manage both platforms during this period so nothing falls through the cracks.
Get a free, vendor-neutral assessment comparing your current VMware costs against Nutanix, Hyper-V and Proxmox — before you sign your next renewal.
Get Your Free Cost Comparison Explore Virtualization Services